Satellite Conjunction Analysis

In 2015, a colleague working as a satellite navigator came to Dr. Balch with a simple complaint, "My collision risk numbers don't make any sense." Dr. Balch looked into how collision risk was being calculated in conjunction analysis; that is, the analysis that a satellite navigator does when his satellite is projected to pass near another satellite or piece of debris. Dr. Balch quickly came to the conclusion that his colleague was right: The "probability" of collision numbers didn't make any sense. The problem was a phenomenon called probability dilution. As uncertainty in the satellite trajectory increased, the risk of collision appeared to decrease. And the idea that worse data make a system safer is foolish on its face. 

In 2016, Dr. Balch presented a paper detailing his early work on the problem. Since then, we have developed a full-scale algorithm for computing collision risk that can be explained in terms of significance testing. Moreover, this work has led to a break-through in our general understanding of epistemic uncertainties resulting from statistical inference. Dr. Balch also has written a paper with co-authors Ryan Martin and Scott Ferson, which is currently under peer review. It is entitled "Satellite Conjunction Analysis and the False Confidence Theorem." 

R-Scripts for producing the Figures One and Two from "Satellite Conjunction Analysis and the False Confidence Theorem" are attached below.
Michael Balch,
Mar 21, 2018, 5:09 PM
Michael Balch,
Mar 21, 2018, 5:10 PM
Michael Balch,
Aug 29, 2017, 5:42 PM